ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS (Akram, Adeel & Alcantud 2019, Symmetry 11(6):795)×فرایند سلسله مراتبی تحلیلی×روش بهترین-بدترین×
حوزهتصمیم‌گیریتصمیم‌گیریتصمیم‌گیری
خانوادهMCDMMCDMMCDM
سال پیدایش201919802015
پدیدآورAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R.Saaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.
نوعDistance-based ranking — m-polar hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS — pole-wise max/min ideals on a weighted mHF decision matrix (Eqs. 1–2), mHF Euclidean distance (Eqs. 3–4), closeness coefficient E_j' (Eq. 5)Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
منبع بنیادینAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R. (2019). Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using an m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Symmetry (MDPI) DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگر
مرتبط388
خلاصهMPF-HF-TOPSIS (m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS (Akram, Adeel & Alcantud 2019, Symmetry 11(6):795) — multi-criteria group decision-making by extending TOPSIS to the m-polar hesitant fuzzy (mHF) set framework; pole-wise mHPIS/mHNIS extraction, mHF Euclidean distance and closeness coefficient ranking) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 1 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: MPF-HF-TOPSIS · AHP · BWM. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-19 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare