ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

مرور سریع مبتنی بر فراتحلیل رگرسیون×فراتحلیل مبتنی بر فراتحلیل رگرسیونی×
حوزهعلم‌سنجیعلم‌سنجی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش2000s–2010s (convergence of rapid review and meta-regression)1993–1999
پدیدآورMeta-regression: Simon Thompson & Stephen Sharp (1999); Rapid review methodology: Cochrane, WHO, and health technology assessment bodies (2000s onward)Stephen G. Thompson & Simon J. Sharp (systematic framework); earlier work by Berlin, Longnecker & Greenland (1993)
نوعQuantitative evidence synthesis variantQuantitative evidence synthesis with covariate modeling
منبع بنیادینThompson, S. G., & Sharp, S. J. (1999). Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine, 18(20), 2693–2708. DOI ↗Thompson, S. G., & Sharp, S. J. (1999). Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine, 18(20), 2693–2708. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرrapid review with meta-regression, accelerated meta-regression review, rapid synthesis with meta-regression, RRMRmeta-regression, meta-analytic regression, weighted regression meta-analysis, MR-MA
مرتبط54
خلاصهA meta-regression-based rapid review is an accelerated evidence synthesis that combines the time-efficient protocols of a rapid review with meta-regression analysis to identify which study-level or population-level characteristics explain variability in effect sizes across included studies. By streamlining search and screening steps without sacrificing the explanatory power of regression modeling, this approach delivers actionable heterogeneity insights under decision-making time constraints.Meta-regression-based meta-analysis extends standard meta-analysis by fitting a weighted regression model in which study-level characteristics (moderators) predict observed effect sizes. Rather than simply pooling effects, this approach asks why effects vary across studies — linking heterogeneity in outcomes to differences in population, intervention, design, or measurement features. It is the primary tool for explaining between-study variance in quantitative evidence synthesis.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: meta-regression-based rapid review · meta-regression-based meta-analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-18 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare