ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

متا-قوم‌نگاری×نظریه داده‌بنیاد×
حوزهعلم‌سنجیپژوهش کیفی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش19881967
پدیدآورGeorge W. Noblit and R. Dwight HareBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
نوعQualitative evidence synthesis methodMethod
منبع بنیادینNoblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930780Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
نام‌های دیگرqualitative meta-synthesis, interpretive synthesis, ethnographic synthesis, meta-ethnographic reviewGT, Grounded Theory Approach
مرتبط43
خلاصهMeta-ethnography is a systematic method for synthesising findings across multiple qualitative studies by comparing and translating the conceptual frameworks and metaphors each study uses. Developed by Noblit and Hare in 1988, it produces a new interpretive account that goes beyond any single study, preserving the richness of qualitative data while generating broader theoretical insights. It is the most influential approach to qualitative evidence synthesis in health, social, and educational research.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Meta-ethnography · Grounded Theory. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-18 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare