مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| Interpretive conversation analysis× | تحلیل گفتمان تفسیری× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | کیفی | کیفی |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 1960s–1970s (CA); interpretive strand formalised 1990s–2000s | 1980s–1990s |
| پدیدآور≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundations); interpretive extension by discourse scholars including Margaret Wetherell | Rooted in interpretivist social science; systematised by Norman Fairclough, Margaret Wetherell, and others |
| نوع≠ | Qualitative discourse research design | Qualitative interpretive research approach |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412922271 | Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761923343 |
| نامهای دیگر | ICA, interpretive CA, hermeneutic conversation analysis, qualitative conversation analysis | IDA, interpretivist discourse analysis, discourse analysis (interpretive), meaning-focused discourse analysis |
| مرتبط | 6 | 6 |
| خلاصه≠ | Interpretive conversation analysis (ICA) examines how meaning is co-constructed turn by turn in talk, combining the micro-sequential rigour of classic conversation analysis with an explicitly interpretive stance. Rather than treating sequential organisation as the sole analytic object, ICA asks what participants are doing socially and discursively through their turns — what identities, institutional agendas, and power relations are built and contested in interaction. It draws on naturally occurring or recorded talk from social, institutional, or interview settings. | Interpretive discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language constructs social realities, identities, and meanings within specific contexts. Operating from an interpretivist epistemology, it treats texts and talk not as transparent windows onto the world but as active sites where meaning is negotiated, and it seeks to understand those meanings from the perspective of participants situated within their social and cultural worlds. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|