ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

تحلیل بین فرهنگی HRAF×تعداد نمونه‌های شناسایی‌شده×
حوزهباستان‌شناسیباستان‌شناسی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش19671971
پدیدآورGeorge MurdockR. E. Chaplin
نوعEthnographic comparisonFaunal quantification method
منبع بنیادینMurdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas. University of Pittsburgh Press. link ↗Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The Study of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Seminar Press. link ↗
نام‌های دیگرcross-cultural comparison, comparative ethnographyNISP method, specimen count
مرتبط24
خلاصهHRAF (Human Relations Area Files) cross-cultural analysis compares ethnographic data from diverse societies to identify patterns and test hypotheses about human social organization and cultural practices. Developed by George Murdock and colleagues, the method uses a standardized database of ethnographic information coded for comparative analysis. HRAF provides a framework for systematic cross-cultural comparison, helping archaeologists interpret prehistoric patterns through ethnographic analogy.Number of identified specimens (NISP) is a fundamental zooarchaeological method that quantifies the abundance of faunal remains by counting all identifiable bone fragments or specimens in an assemblage. Formalized by R. E. Chaplin and later refined by Donald Grayson and others, NISP is the most straightforward and widely used quantification metric in zooarchaeology. Despite its simplicity, NISP is sensitive to both cultural and taphonomic factors that affect preservation, fragmentation, and identification of bone assemblages.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: HRAF Cross-Cultural Analysis · Number of Identified Specimens. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-20 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare