مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| تطابق دقیق تقریبزده اثرات درمان ناهمگن× | روش تفاوت در تفاوت (Diff-in-Diff)× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه≠ | استنتاج علّی | اقتصادسنجی |
| خانواده | Regression model | Regression model |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 2012-2013 | 1994 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM foundation, 2012); subgroup HTE extensions by Imai & colleagues | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) |
| نوع≠ | Matching-based causal inference with subgroup CATE estimation | Causal inference / panel regression |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 |
| نامهای دیگر≠ | HTE-CEM, CEM with CATE estimation, subgroup CEM, coarsened exact matching with effect heterogeneity | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) |
| مرتبط | 5 | 5 |
| خلاصه≠ | Heterogeneous treatment effect coarsened exact matching (HTE-CEM) extends the coarsened exact matching framework to estimate how treatment effects vary across subgroups or individual characteristics. After CEM creates balanced strata by coarsening continuous covariates into bins and exactly matching units within each bin, conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are computed within or across these strata, revealing where treatment works, for whom, and by how much. | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|