مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| تحلیل هرمنوتیک× | تحلیل گفتمان× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه≠ | روشهای میدانی | پژوهش کیفی |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 19th–20th century (Schleiermacher ~1819; Dilthey ~1883; Gadamer 1960; Ricoeur 1969) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| پدیدآور≠ | Friedrich Schleiermacher; Wilhelm Dilthey; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul Ricoeur | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| نوع≠ | Qualitative interpretive method | Method |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960 as Wahrheit und Methode). ISBN: 978-0826400185 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر≠ | hermeneutics, hermeneutical interpretation, interpretive hermeneutics, philosophical hermeneutics | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| مرتبط≠ | 6 | 2 |
| خلاصه≠ | Hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative interpretive method for uncovering the meaning of texts, documents, spoken discourse, or human actions. Rooted in 19th-century biblical and legal scholarship and systematised by Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur, it operates through the hermeneutic circle: the meaning of a part is understood through the whole, and the meaning of the whole is revised as parts are interpreted. The goal is not to measure or code, but to achieve a deepening, dialogic understanding of the object of interpretation. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|