ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

مرور پیمایشی میدانی×تحلیل کتاب‌سنجی×
حوزهعلم‌سنجیعلم‌سنجی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش2005 (foundational framework); field-mapping purpose formalised c. 2015–20181969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
پدیدآورArksey & O'Malley (scoping review framework); field-mapping purpose formalised by Munn et al. and Peters et al.Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
نوعEvidence synthesis — systematic review variantQuantitative literature analysis
منبع بنیادینMunn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic review and scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. DOI ↗Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗
نام‌های دیگرfield-mapping scoping study, evidence-mapping scoping review, field map review, scoping review for field mappingbibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
مرتبط66
خلاصهA field-mapping scoping review is a purposive variant of the scoping review in which the overarching goal is to chart the conceptual and empirical landscape of a research field — identifying what has been studied, by whom, using which methods, and where knowledge gaps remain. It follows the Arksey and O'Malley scoping framework but is explicitly oriented toward producing a structured map of a field rather than answering a focused clinical or policy question.Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Field-mapping Scoping review · Bibliometric Analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-18 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare