مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| طراحی روش ترکیبی کمی-اولویتمحورِ ناظر بر ارزیابی× | طراحی روشهای ترکیبی عملگرا× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | طراحی پژوهش | طراحی پژوهش |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 2003–2011 | Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century |
| پدیدآور≠ | Teddlie & Tashakkori; Creswell & Plano Clark | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty |
| نوع | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| نامهای دیگر | QUAN-priority evaluation mixed methods, quantitative-dominant evaluation design, evaluation mixed methods with quantitative priority, QUAN-priority eval MMR | pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods |
| مرتبط | 6 | 6 |
| خلاصه≠ | An evaluation-oriented quantitative-priority mixed methods design applies mixed methods inquiry within an evaluation context, where the primary purpose is judging a program, policy, or intervention. Quantitative data carry the greater evidential weight — measuring outcomes, effectiveness, and reach — while qualitative data serve as a secondary, explanatory strand that contextualizes and deepens interpretation of the quantitative findings. | Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|