ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

Cultural Salience Analysis×Rank-Order Elicitation×
حوزهAnthropologyAnthropology
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش19971988
پدیدآورSmith & Borgatti; cognitive anthropology traditionCognitive anthropology tradition (Weller & Romney)
نوعAnalysis procedure for quantifying item importance in free-list dataElicitation procedure for ordering items on a single criterion
منبع بنیادینBernard, H. R. (2017). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (6th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN: 9780759112421Weller, S. C., & Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic Data Collection. Qualitative Research Methods Series 10. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. ISBN: 9780803930742
نام‌های دیگرSalience Analysis, Smith's Salience Index, Free-List Salience Analysis, Item Salience ScoringRanking Task, Complete Ranking Elicitation, Ordinal Ranking Task, Rank Aggregation
مرتبط44
خلاصهCultural salience analysis is the analytical step that turns raw free-list data into a ranked measure of how culturally central each item is, by combining two signals that free lists capture for free: how often an item is mentioned and how early it appears in informants' lists. The standard estimator is Smith's salience index S, which credits each item for being both common across people and prominent in recall, then averages that credit over the whole sample. Breaking salience out by code or subgroup further reveals how the importance of items shifts across genders, ages, expertise levels, or cultural groups.Rank-order elicitation asks each informant to place a set of items into a complete order on a single criterion — from most to least important, severe, preferred, or typical — so that the whole domain is captured in one ordinal judgment per person. Unlike paired comparison, which gathers many local two-item choices, ranking obtains the global order directly, trading some redundancy for speed. Aggregating the individual rankings produces a group ordering, while a concordance statistic measures how strongly the informants agree.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Cultural Salience Analysis · Rank-Order Elicitation. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-25 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare