مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| آزمایش متقاطع چند بازو× | آزمایش تصادفی دوسوکور متقاطع× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | طراحی آزمایش | طراحی آزمایش |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | Mid-20th century; multi-arm extensions formalized by 1970s–1980s | 1960s (Grizzle 1965 for statistical foundations); widely used in clinical research since the 1970s |
| پدیدآور≠ | Developed from early crossover trial methodology (Williams 1949; Cochran & Cox 1957) | Early formalized by statisticians including Bradford Hill and colleagues in clinical trials; theoretical framework developed by Grizzle (1965) and later Senn (2002) |
| نوع≠ | Within-subject experimental design with multiple treatment arms | Experimental within-subject design |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Jones, B., & Kenward, M. G. (2003). Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. ISBN: 978-1584883869 | Senn, S. (2002). Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471496533 |
| نامهای دیگر | multi-arm crossover trial, multi-period multi-treatment crossover, CMAT, multi-treatment crossover experiment | crossover RCT, crossover trial, within-subject RCT, AB/BA crossover design |
| مرتبط | 5 | 5 |
| خلاصه≠ | A crossover multi-arm experiment is a within-subject experimental design in which each participant receives three or more treatments (arms) across successive periods, with random assignment to sequence. Because every participant experiences all arms, the design eliminates between-subject variability from treatment comparisons, dramatically increasing statistical power for a given sample size. It is widely used in clinical pharmacology, psychology, agriculture, and behavioral research. | A crossover randomized controlled trial (crossover RCT) is an experimental design in which each participant receives all study interventions in a randomized sequence, separated by a washout period. Because every participant serves as their own control, within-subject variability is eliminated from the treatment comparison, yielding greater statistical power per participant than a parallel-group RCT of equal size. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|