مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

	مطالعه موردی واحد انتقادی	تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی
حوزه	کیفی	کیفی
خانواده	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
سال پیدایش	1984 (Yin's foundational text); critical framing developed through 1990s–2000s	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
پدیدآور	Robert K. Yin (case study design); Bent Flyvbjerg (critical case logic); critical theory influence from Max Horkheimer and Frankfurt School	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
نوع	Qualitative research design	Qualitative research method
منبع بنیادین	Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
نام‌های دیگر	critical case study, critical-theory case study, single critical case, CSCS	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
مرتبط	4	6
خلاصه	A critical single case study is a qualitative research design that investigates one bounded, strategically selected case through a critical-theory lens, aiming not only to understand the case in depth but also to expose underlying power relations, structural inequalities, or ideological conditions that shape the phenomenon. It combines the analytic depth of single-case inquiry with the emancipatory agenda of critical social science.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.