ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

تحلیل پدیدارشناختی تفسیری انتقادی (Critical IPA)×پدیدارشناسی هرمنوتیکی انتقادی×
حوزهکیفیکیفی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش1996 (IPA); critical variant explicitly theorised in the 2000s–2010s1960s–1990s (Gadamer 1960; van Manen 1990; critical synthesis developed through 1990s–2000s)
پدیدآورJonathan A. Smith (IPA); critical extension developed within the IPA tradition by Smith, Flowers, Larkin and associated scholarsHans-Georg Gadamer (hermeneutic tradition); Max van Manen (pedagogical application); influenced by Frankfurt School critical theory
نوعQualitative research design and analytic approachQualitative research approach
منبع بنیادینSmith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645
نام‌های دیگرCritical IPA, CIPA, critical-lens IPA, critical interpretive phenomenologyCHP, critical hermeneutics, critically-oriented hermeneutic phenomenology, hermeneutic phenomenology with critical lens
مرتبط56
خلاصهCritical Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (Critical IPA) is a qualitative approach that combines the double-hermeneutic interpretive work of standard IPA with an explicit critical lens, examining not only how participants make sense of their experience but also how power, social structures, ideology, and systemic inequalities shape that experience. It retains the ideographic, person-centred rigour of IPA while asking whose interests are served and what is silenced or constrained.Critical hermeneutic phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that combines Gadamerian hermeneutics — the philosophical study of interpretation — with critical social theory to examine both the lived meaning of experience and the structural, ideological, and power-laden conditions that shape it. It asks not only 'what is this experience like?' but also 'what historical, social, and political forces produce and constrain it?' The approach is widely used in education, nursing, social work, and the human sciences.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Critical Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis · Critical Hermeneutic Phenomenology. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-20 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare