مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

روایی همگرا×روایی سازه×
حوزهروان‌سنجیروان‌سنجی
خانوادهLatent structureLatent structure
سال پیدایش19591955
پدیدآورDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. FiskeLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
نوعValidity evidence / construct validationValidity evaluation framework
منبع بنیادینCampbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validityconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
مرتبط46
خلاصهConvergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو Download slides

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Convergent Validity · Construct Validity. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-15 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare