مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

روایی محتوا×روایی سازه×
حوزهروان‌سنجیروان‌سنجی
خانوادهLatent structureLatent structure
سال پیدایش19751955
پدیدآورC. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurementLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
نوعValidity evidence / expert judgement procedureValidity evaluation framework
منبع بنیادینLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرcontent-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
مرتبط66
خلاصهContent validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو Download slides

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Content Validity · Construct Validity. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-15 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare