مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

روایی سازه×روایی همگرا×
حوزهروان‌سنجیروان‌سنجی
خانوادهLatent structureLatent structure
سال پیدایش19551959
پدیدآورLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. MeehlDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
نوعValidity evaluation frameworkValidity evidence / construct validation
منبع بنیادینCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretationconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
مرتبط64
خلاصهConstruct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو Download slides

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Construct Validity · Convergent Validity. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-15 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare