ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

نظریه داده‌بنیاد مقایسه‌ای×تحلیل مضمونی مقایسه‌ای×
حوزهکیفیکیفی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward2000s–2010s (as an explicit comparative variant of thematic analysis)
پدیدآورBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholarsVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis foundation); comparative extension developed in applied policy and cross-cultural qualitative research traditions
نوعQualitative comparative research designQualitative comparative analytical strategy
منبع بنیادینGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرcross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysiscross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, multi-group thematic analysis, comparative qualitative thematic analysis
مرتبط66
خلاصهComparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies.Comparative Thematic Analysis applies the structured procedures of thematic analysis across two or more distinct groups, sites, or time points, with the explicit aim of identifying both shared patterns and meaningful differences. Rather than producing a single composite account of experience, it yields a layered analysis that maps where themes converge and diverge across comparison units — making it especially valuable for policy-relevant, cross-cultural, or multi-site qualitative studies.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Comparative grounded theory · Comparative Thematic Analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-17 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare