مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| تحلیل مکالمه تطبیقی× | تحلیل گفتمان× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه≠ | کیفی | پژوهش کیفی |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 1974 (CA foundation); comparative applications from 1980s–1990s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| پدیدآور≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundation); comparative extension developed across the field from the 1980s onward | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| نوع≠ | Qualitative micro-analytic research design | Method |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر≠ | comparative CA, cross-contextual conversation analysis, comparative interactional analysis, comparative talk-in-interaction | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| مرتبط≠ | 3 | 2 |
| خلاصه≠ | Comparative Conversation Analysis (comparative CA) applies the rigorous micro-analytic methods of Conversation Analysis across two or more contrasting interactional settings, languages, cultures, or participant groups. It examines how the sequential organisation of talk — turn-taking, repair, adjacency pairs, and action formation — varies or remains stable across contexts, producing cross-contextual evidence about the architecture of human interaction. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|