مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| Co-Production Analysis× | Social Construction of Technology× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 2004 | 1984 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Sheila Jasanoff | Trevor Pinch & Wiebe Bijker |
| نوع≠ | Interpretive analytic framework (idiom) in science and technology studies | Constructivist theory of technological development |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge. ISBN: 9780415403290 | Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر | Co-production idiom, Co-productionist analysis, Knowledge and social order analysis | SCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysis |
| مرتبط | 4 | 4 |
| خلاصه≠ | Co-production analysis applies the 'idiom of co-production' developed by Sheila Jasanoff: the claim that the ways we know the world are inseparable from the ways we choose to live in it. Scientific knowledge and social order are not produced in separate spheres that later interact; they are produced together. Co-production analysis traces this simultaneous making of natural and social facts—how a new way of knowing nature is bound up with new identities, institutions, discourses, and representations that together stabilise both knowledge and political order. | The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|