مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| آزمایش عاملی تصادفی خوشهای× | آزمایش تصادفی خوشهای کنترلشده× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | طراحی آزمایش | طراحی آزمایش |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 1990s (formalized in group-randomized trial literature) | 1978–1980s |
| پدیدآور≠ | David M. Murray and colleagues; Allan Donner & Neil Klar | Cornfield (1978); systematised by Donner and colleagues (1980s) |
| نوع | Experimental design | Experimental design |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195120912 | Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340652978 |
| نامهای دیگر | cluster-randomized factorial design, group-randomized factorial trial, CRT factorial, clustered factorial experiment | cluster RCT, group-randomized trial, community randomized trial, cluster-randomized experiment |
| مرتبط≠ | 5 | 4 |
| خلاصه≠ | A cluster randomized factorial experiment assigns intact groups (clusters such as schools, clinics, or communities) at random to all combinations of two or more treatment factors, enabling simultaneous evaluation of multiple interventions and their interactions while respecting the natural grouping of participants. It merges the logistical and ethical advantages of cluster randomization with the efficiency of factorial design. | A cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster RCT) is an experimental design in which intact social or organisational groups — such as schools, clinics, villages, or workplaces — are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individual participants. Outcomes are still measured at the individual level, but the unit of randomization is the cluster. This design is essential when an intervention is delivered to whole groups, when there is a risk of contamination between participants in the same setting, or when individual randomization is logistically or ethically impractical. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|