ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

سیستم رتبه‌بندی CAMELS×امتیاز Z آلتمن: پیش‌بینی ورشکستگی شرکت‌ها×امتیازدهی اعتباری (کارت امتیازی، WoE/IV)×تحلیل دوپونت×
حوزهمالیمالیمالیمالی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineRegression modelRegression modelRegression model
سال پیدایش1998196819972008
پدیدآورUS bank supervisory framework; Cole & GuntherEdward AltmanHand & Henley; Thomas, Edelman & CrookDuPont Corporation; Soliman
نوعComposite supervisory ratingMultiple discriminant analysis scoring modelSupervised binary classification modelProfitability decomposition framework
منبع بنیادینCole, R. A., & Gunther, J. W. (1998). Predicting bank failures: A comparison of on- and off-site monitoring systems. Journal of Financial Services Research, 13(2), 103–117. DOI ↗Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609. DOI ↗Hand, D. J., & Henley, W. E. (1997). Statistical classification methods in consumer credit scoring: a review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 160(3), 523–541. DOI ↗Soliman, M. T. (2008). The use of DuPont analysis by market participants. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 823–853. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرCAMELS Framework, Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System, UFIRS, CAMELS Derecelendirme SistemiAltman's Z-Score Model, Multiple Discriminant Analysis Bankruptcy Model, Z-Score Financial Distress Model, Altman Z-SkoruCredit Scorecard, Application Scoring, Behavioural Scoring, Kredi SkorlamaDuPont Decomposition, DuPont Identity, Return on Equity Decomposition, DuPont Analizi
مرتبط3332
خلاصهThe CAMELS Rating System is a supervisory framework used by US bank regulators to evaluate the overall condition of financial institutions across six dimensions: Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity, and Sensitivity to Market Risk. Each component is scored on a scale of 1 (strong) to 5 (critically deficient), and a composite score is assigned based on examiner judgment. Developed in the US federal banking regulatory context, CAMELS emerged as the standard on-site examination tool and has since been adopted and adapted by regulators globally.The Altman Z-Score is a linear discriminant model developed by Edward I. Altman in 1968 to predict corporate bankruptcy using five accounting-based financial ratios. Derived through multiple discriminant analysis on a matched sample of 66 US manufacturing firms, the model combines liquidity, profitability, leverage, solvency, and activity ratios into a single composite score that classifies firms as financially sound, distressed, or in a grey zone.Credit scoring is a statistical technique that estimates the probability that a borrower will default on a financial obligation. Using Weight of Evidence (WoE) binning, Information Value (IV) variable selection, and logistic regression, it converts raw applicant data into a single integer score. Formalized by Hand and Henley (1997) and elaborated by Thomas, Edelman, and Crook, the scorecard framework has become the regulatory standard for retail credit risk assessment in banking, lending, and insurance.DuPont Analysis is a financial performance framework that decomposes Return on Equity (ROE) into three multiplicative components: net profit margin, asset turnover, and the equity multiplier. Originally developed by engineers at DuPont Corporation in the early 1920s, the method gained renewed academic prominence through Soliman (2008), who demonstrated that market participants exploit DuPont decompositions to forecast future earnings and to distinguish sustainable from transient profitability.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 1 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: CAMELS Rating · Altman Z-Score · Credit Scoring · DuPont Analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-20 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare