مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| مرور نقشهبرداری با کمک کتابسنجی (bibliometrix-Assisted Mapping Review)× | مرور پیمایشی× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | علمسنجی | علمسنجی |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 2017 (bibliometrix tool); mapping review approach formalised c. 2010s | 2005 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Aria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix, 2017); mapping review methodology developed in evidence synthesis community (~2000s) | Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley |
| نوع≠ | Tool-assisted evidence mapping review | Evidence synthesis review design |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI ↗ | Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر | bibliometrix mapping review, R-bibliometrix evidence map, bibliometric-assisted systematic map, bibliometrix evidence synthesis map | scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map |
| مرتبط≠ | 5 | 6 |
| خلاصه≠ | A bibliometrix-assisted mapping review combines the structured scope-and-search logic of an evidence mapping review with the analytical power of the bibliometrix R package. Instead of manually categorising studies, the researcher leverages bibliometrix functions — keyword co-occurrence networks, thematic clustering, and yearly trend analysis — to chart the landscape of a research field systematically and at scale, producing an interactive, reproducible evidence map. | A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|