ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

مطالعه بیزی دقت تشخیصی×ارزیابی آزمون غربالگری×
حوزهاپیدمیولوژیاپیدمیولوژی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش1995–20011968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
پدیدآورJoseph, Gyorkos & Coupal; Dendukuri & Joseph (formal Bayesian DTA framework)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
نوعBayesian inferential study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
منبع بنیادینDendukuri, N., & Joseph, L. (2001). Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests. Biometrics, 57(1), 158–167. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
نام‌های دیگرBayesian DTA study, Bayesian test evaluation, Bayesian diagnostic test accuracy, BDASscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
مرتبط66
خلاصهA Bayesian diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a medical test distinguishes between people who have a condition and those who do not, using Bayesian statistical methods that formally incorporate prior knowledge into the estimation of sensitivity, specificity, and related measures. Unlike classical approaches that rely solely on the observed sample, Bayesian inference combines a likelihood model of the data with prior probability distributions to produce posterior estimates with intuitive credible intervals.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Bayesian Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Screening Test Evaluation. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-15 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare