مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

	فرایند شبکه‌ای تحلیلی (AHP با بازخورد و وابستگی‌های متقابل)	روش بهترین-بدترین	ارزیابی تناسبی پیچیده
حوزه	تصمیم‌گیری	تصمیم‌گیری	تصمیم‌گیری
خانواده	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
سال پیدایش	1996	2015	1996
پدیدآور	Saaty, T. L.	Rezaei, J.	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
نوع	Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP	Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
منبع بنیادین	Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65
نام‌های دیگر	—	—	—
مرتبط	8	8	8
خلاصه	ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.