مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| فرایند سلسله مراتبی تحلیلی× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | تصمیمگیری | تصمیمگیری |
| خانواده | MCDM | MCDM |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 1980 | 1995 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| نوع≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر | — | — |
| مرتبط | 8 | 8 |
| خلاصه≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|