ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineBiblical exegesis / Gospel composition

Redaction Criticism

Redaction criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte) studies the biblical authors not as passive collectors of tradition but as genuine authors and theologians who shaped their inherited material to make a point. Where form criticism dissolved the Gospels into independent oral units, redaction criticism puts the spotlight back on the evangelist who selected, arranged, and edited those units. By comparing the final text with the sources and traditions behind it, the critic isolates the changes the author made, looks for a consistent pattern in those changes, and reads off the theological program that motivated them. Hans Conzelmann's 1953 study of Luke is the classic example, and Norman Perrin's 1969 primer What Is Redaction Criticism? introduced the method to English readers and articulated its logic.

Ava rakenduses MethodMindPeagiRakenda, võrdle, saa juhiseid
Tööriistad ja ressursid
Laadi slaidid alla
Õpi ja avasta
VideoPeagi

Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust

Ainult liikmetele

Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.

Logi sisse

Meetodikaart

Seotud meetodite ümbruskond — vali sõlm, et seda uurida.

Allikad

  1. Perrin, N. (1969). What Is Redaction Criticism? Philadelphia: Fortress Press. ISBN: 9780800601812
  2. Conzelmann, H. (1960). The Theology of St Luke (trans. G. Buswell). New York: Harper. [German 'Die Mitte der Zeit', 1953]. link

Kuidas sellele lehele viidata

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/religious-studies/redaction-criticism

Milline meetod?

Aseta see meetod oma lähimate sugulaste kõrvale ja loe neid kõrvuti — raamatukogu laob raamatud lauale; valik on sinu.

Võrdle kõrvuti

Sellele viitavad

ScholarGateRedaction Criticism (Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author)). Loetud 2026-06-24 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/religious-studies/redaction-criticism · Andmestik: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026