Summative Evaluation
Summative evaluation is evaluation conducted to render an overall judgement of a program, policy or product — its merit, worth, effectiveness or impact — typically after it has been implemented or has matured. Named by Michael Scriven in his 1967 essay 'The Methodology of Evaluation' as the counterpart to formative evaluation, its purpose is to inform consequential decisions: whether to continue, expand, replicate, defund or certify an intervention. It addresses the bottom-line question 'did it work, and was it worth it?' for audiences such as funders, policymakers and the public.
Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust
Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.
Meetodikaart
Seotud meetodite ümbruskond — vali sõlm, et seda uurida.
Allikad
- Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago: Rand McNally. ISBN: 9780528616600
Kuidas sellele lehele viidata
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Summative Evaluation of Program Merit and Worth. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/public-policy/summative-evaluation
Milline meetod?
Aseta see meetod oma lähimate sugulaste kõrvale ja loe neid kõrvuti — raamatukogu laob raamatud lauale; valik on sinu.
- Kontrafaktuaalne mõju hindamine (CIE)Põhjuslik järeldamine↔ võrdle
- Formative EvaluationPublic Policy↔ võrdle
- Impact Evaluation DesignPublic Policy↔ võrdle
- Process EvaluationPublic Policy↔ võrdle
Sellele viitavad
Sarnased meetodid
Märkasid sellel lehel viga? Teata sellest või paku parandust →