ScholarGate
Assistent
Latent structureScale / measurement

Järjestuslik sisuということで kehtivuse hindamine

Järjestuslik sisuということで kehtivuse hindamine asendab traditsioonilise binaarse (jah/ei) eksperdi asjakohasuse hindamise astmelise, Likerti tüüpi hindamisskaalaga, mis võimaldab koguda rikkalikumat eksperdiarvamust skaala üksuste sobivuse hindamisel kavandatud konstruktsioonidomeeni esindamiseks.

Ava rakenduses MethodMindPeagiVideoPeagiDownload slides

Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust

Ainult liikmetele

Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.

Logi sisse

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Allikad

  1. Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI: 10.1177/0193945903252998
  2. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2007). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20147

Kuidas sellele lehele viidata

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Ordinal Content Validity Assessment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/psychometrics/ordinal-content-validity

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side
ScholarGateOrdinal Content Validity (Ordinal Content Validity Assessment). Loetud 2026-06-15 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/psychometrics/ordinal-content-validity · Andmestik: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026