ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineIndirect questioning techniques

List Experiment

The list experiment, also called the item count technique, is a survey design that measures the prevalence of a sensitive attitude or behavior without ever requiring any respondent to directly disclose it. Respondents are randomly split into two groups: a control group sees a list of innocuous items and reports only how many apply to them, while a treatment group sees the same list plus one sensitive item. Because respondents report only a count, no individual answer reveals their stance on the sensitive item, and the difference in average counts between the groups estimates the proportion holding the sensitive trait.

Ava rakenduses MethodMindPeagiRakenda, võrdle, saa juhiseid
Tööriistad ja ressursid
Laadi slaidid alla
Õpi ja avasta
VideoPeagi

Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust

Ainult liikmetele

Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.

Logi sisse

Meetodikaart

Seotud meetodite ümbruskond — vali sõlm, et seda uurida.

Allikad

  1. Imai, K. (2011). Multivariate Regression Analysis for the Item Count Technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(494), 407–416. DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10415
  2. Blair, G., & Imai, K. (2012). Statistical Analysis of List Experiments. Political Analysis, 20(1), 47–77. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpr048
  3. Glynn, A. N. (2013). What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum? Design and Analysis of the List Experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(S1), 159–172. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfs070

Kuidas sellele lehele viidata

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). List Experiment (Item Count Technique). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/political-science/list-experiment

Milline meetod?

Aseta see meetod oma lähimate sugulaste kõrvale ja loe neid kõrvuti — raamatukogu laob raamatud lauale; valik on sinu.

Võrdle kõrvuti

Sellele viitavad

ScholarGateList Experiment (List Experiment (Item Count Technique)). Loetud 2026-06-24 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/political-science/list-experiment · Andmestik: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026