Liigu sisuleScholarGate
RaamatukoguMinu raamatukoguTöölaudReview StudioAssistent
Logi sisse
NBD-Dirichlet Model/Tõendid
Meetodi tõendite kirje

NBD-Dirichlet Model

The NBD-Dirichlet model is the canonical stochastic model of repeat buying and brand choice in stationary, competitive consumer-goods markets. Introduced by Gerald Goodhardt, Andrew Ehrenberg and Christopher Chatfield in their 1984 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society paper "The Dirichlet," it integrates two processes: how often households buy in a product category, modeled by the negative binomial distribution (NBD), and how those purchases are split across competing brands, modeled by a multinomial-Dirichlet process. From just a few parameters, the model reproduces a remarkably wide set of empirical regularities, including each brand's penetration (how many people buy it), its buyers' purchase frequency, repeat-purchase rates, the share of category requirements each brand earns, and the duplication of purchase between brands. The model encodes Ehrenberg's classic 'laws' of buying behavior, most famously double jeopardy, whereby small brands suffer twice over by having both fewer buyers and slightly less loyal buyers. It assumes a stationary, non-partitioned market with brand choice that looks like sampling 'as if from an urn,' and it serves as a benchmark of what normal, no-loyalty-segmentation buying looks like, against which deviations such as genuine partitioning or excess loyalty can be detected.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Allikakirje

Tsiteeringud kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest sõna-sõnalt. Nendest ei saa järeldada väidete tasemel kinnitust.

NBD-Dirichlet Model of Repeat Buying and Brand Choice
Taksonoomiline meetodikirje · regression-model / marketing
  • Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Chatfield, C. (1984). The Dirichlet: A Comprehensive Model of Buying Behaviour. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 147(5), 621-655. · DOI 10.2307/2981696
Ava täielik meetod

Kureeritud väited

Väited on salvestatud tõendite registrisse, igal oma hinnanguga.

Kureeritud väiteid veel pole

See vaade ei loo väite hinnangut, kui registris seda pole.

Seotud meetodid

Genereeritud meetodigraafist ja kuvatud masina soovitatud seostena – väiteid ei järeldata.

Same method familyBG/NBD Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainCustomer Lifetime Valuemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainRFM Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainShare of Wallet Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Tõendite olek

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Allikad

1 salvestatud tsiteering, kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest.

Toimingud

Ava meetodi leht
ScholarGate

Sisukeskne teatmekogu uurimismeetoditest — mis iga meetod on, kuidas see töötab ja kust see pärineb.

Avaandmed (CC-BY)

Avasta

  • Raamatukogu
  • Otsi meetodeid…
  • Sirvi valdkonna järgi
  • Valdkonnad
  • Teekond
  • Võrdle
  • Milline meetod?

Viited

  • Valdkonnad
  • Atlas
  • Sõnastik
  • Metoodika
  • Filosoofia

Tööruum

  • Minu raamatukogu
  • Töölaud
  • Vestlus

Ettevõte

  • Meist
  • Hinnad
  • Kontakt
  • Soovita meetodit

Kirjed on koostatud avaldatud allikate põhjal viiteotstarbel. Teabe õigsuse ja sobivuse kontrollimine teie enda kasutuse jaoks jääb teie vastutusele.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Uurimismeetodite teatmekogu
  • Privaatsus
  • Küpsised
  • Tingimused
Kustuta konto