Meetodi tõendite kirje

Controversy Mapping

Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Allikakirje

Tsiteeringud kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest sõna-sõnalt. Nendest ei saa järeldada väidete tasemel kinnitust.

Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies)

Taksonoomiline meetodikirje · process-pipeline / science-technology-studies

Ava täielik meetod

Kureeritud väited

Väited on salvestatud tõendite registrisse, igal oma hinnanguga.

Kureeritud väiteid veel pole

See vaade ei loo väite hinnangut, kui registris seda pole.

Seotud meetodid

Genereeritud meetodigraafist ja kuvatud masina soovitatud seostena – väiteid ei järeldata.

Same method familyActor-Network Theory Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBoundary-Work Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySocial Construction of Technologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySociotechnical Imaginaries Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.