Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis
Bureaucratic reputation analysis is an analytical framework for explaining the behaviour, power and autonomy of public agencies through the lens of their reputation — the set of symbolic beliefs about an agency's capacities, intentions and history held by its many audiences. Developed by Daniel Carpenter, notably in his 2001 study of how U.S. executive agencies forged autonomy, and elaborated with George Krause, the framework treats reputation as a strategic asset that agencies cultivate and protect. It distinguishes performative, moral, technical and procedural dimensions of reputation and traces how reputational concerns drive what agencies do.
Allikakirje
Tsiteeringud kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest sõna-sõnalt. Nendest ei saa järeldada väidete tasemel kinnitust.
- Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press. · ISBN 9780691070100
- Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32. · DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x
Kureeritud väited
Väited on salvestatud tõendite registrisse, igal oma hinnanguga.
See vaade ei loo väite hinnangut, kui registris seda pole.
Seotud meetodid
Genereeritud meetodigraafist ja kuvatud masina soovitatud seostena – väiteid ei järeldata.