Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| UTA*× | Kriteeriumide tähtsus interkriteeriumite korrelatsiooni kaudu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Otsustamine | Otsustamine |
| Perekond | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 1985 | 1995 |
| Looja≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tüüp≠ | Additive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgements | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Algallikas≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Rööpnimetused | — | — |
| Seotud | 8 | 8 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | UTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|