Võrdle meetodeid

	Ruumiüritiste uuringukujundus	Dünaamiline erinevuste erinevuste meetod
Valdkond	Põhjuslik järeldamine	Põhjuslik järeldamine
Perekond	Regression model	Regression model
Tekkeaasta	2000s–2010s	2021
Looja	Developed across applied spatial economics literature; canonical applications in Autor, Dorn & Hanson (2013) and related regional economics studies	Callaway & Sant'Anna; Sun & Abraham
Tüüp	Quasi-experimental causal inference with spatial structure	Causal inference / quasi-experimental
Algallikas	Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121-2168.	Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230.
Rööpnimetused	spatial event study, geographic event study, spatial dynamic DiD, place-based event study	Dynamic DiD, Staggered DiD, Event-time DiD, Heterogeneous-timing DiD
Seotud	5	4
Kokkuvõte	Spatial event study design estimates the dynamic causal effects of a geographically concentrated shock or policy by plotting how outcomes in affected locations evolve relative to unaffected locations across time periods, while explicitly accounting for spatial spillovers and autocorrelation across geographic units. It is widely used in regional and urban economics to evaluate place-based policies, trade shocks, and local labour market interventions.	Dynamic Difference-in-Differences extends the classic DiD framework to settings where units adopt treatment at different times. Rather than collapsing all variation into a single 2x2 comparison, it estimates group-time average treatment effects for each adoption cohort at each calendar period, then aggregates them into interpretable summaries of the causal effect over event time.