Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| Religioosse orientatsiooni küsimusskaala× | Usalduste süsteemi inventuur (SBI)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Religioonipsühholoogia | Religioonipsühholoogia |
| Perekond | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 1976 | 2011 |
| Looja≠ | Daniel C. Batson & W. Larry Ventis | James M. Holland, Jill M. Currier, & Robert A. Neimeyer |
| Tüüp | Self-report | Self-report |
| Algallikas≠ | Batson, C. D., & Ventis, W. L. (1982). The Religious Experience: A Social-Psychological Perspective. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195030761. link ↗ | Holland, J. M., Currier, J. M., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2011). The Systems of Belief Inventory: Factor structure and association with psychosocial outcome in bereavement. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 311–321. link ↗ |
| Rööpnimetused | Quest Scale, Religious Quest | SBI, SBI-15 |
| Seotud | 4 | 4 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | The Quest Scale, developed by Batson and Ventis (1976), is a 12-item self-report measure of a third religious orientation beyond Allport and Ross's intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity. The 'quest' orientation reflects an open, questioning approach to religion: someone who views faith as an ongoing journey of exploration and doubt rather than a settled worldview or instrumental tool. High quest scorers embrace existential uncertainty, seek genuine answers to life's deepest questions, and are comfortable with religious doubt and revision. The scale has become important in understanding mature religious development and predicting prosocial behavior, openness, and psychological flexibility. | The Systems of Belief Inventory (SBI), developed by Holland, Currier, and Neimeyer in 2011, is a 15-item self-report measure designed to assess the coherence, flexibility, and adaptive function of an individual's worldview and meaning-making system. Originally validated in bereavement research, the SBI captures dimensions of spiritual and existential belief that predict psychological adjustment following loss or trauma. It measures three key aspects: existential meaning-making, negative religious coping, and hope. The scale is useful in grief counseling, trauma recovery, and any clinical context where worldview disruption occurs. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|