Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| Poliitikahindamise kalduvuskoormise kaalutamine× | Pöörd-tõenäosuskaalutamine (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Põhjuslik järeldamine | Põhjuslik järeldamine |
| Perekond | Regression model | Regression model |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 1983/2003 | 2000 |
| Looja≠ | Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); extended to policy evaluation by Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003) | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Tüüp≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Algallikas≠ | Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Rööpnimetused≠ | PSW policy evaluation, inverse probability weighting for policy, IPW policy evaluation, policy PSW | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Seotud≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | Policy evaluation propensity score weighting applies inverse-probability weighting to observational data to estimate the causal effect of a policy program. By reweighting participants and non-participants so they resemble a target population, it removes selection bias from voluntary or administratively allocated program assignment without requiring randomization. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|