Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| Isikukesksuse hindamise tööriist× | Patsiendi võimestamise instrument× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Patsiendikeskne ravi | Patsiendikeskne ravi |
| Perekond | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 2010 | 1998 |
| Looja≠ | Brendan McCormack, David Edvardsson | J. G. Howie |
| Tüüp≠ | Staff-rated or Mixed | Patient-reported |
| Algallikas≠ | McCormack, B., Eley, D., Prideaux, D., & Jackson, D. (2010). Blending critical realism and hermeneutics in a PhD research: Researching person-centred care. Qualitative Research Journal, 10(1), 42-54. link ↗ | Howie, J. G., Heaney, D. J., Maxwell, M., & Zwanenberg, D. (1998). A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two other consultations outcome measures. British Journal of General Practice, 48(427), 1211-1216. link ↗ |
| Rööpnimetused | PCAT-SV, PCC Assessment Scale | PEI, Patient Enablement Score |
| Seotud | 4 | 4 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | The Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) is an observational and staff-report instrument designed to evaluate the degree to which healthcare services and interactions embody person-centered care principles. Developed by Brendan McCormack and David Edvardsson, the PCAT assesses key dimensions of person-centered practice: knowing the person, being respectful, engaging authentically, taking a holistic view, and adapting care to individual values and preferences. The tool has been widely used in nursing homes, dementia care, hospital wards, and community health settings to evaluate care environment quality and identify opportunities for person-centered transformation. | The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a brief, validated six-item questionnaire that measures the degree to which a clinical consultation leaves the patient feeling more capable of understanding and managing their health condition. Developed by Howie and colleagues in 1998, the PEI assesses whether the consultation helped the patient understand their problem, cope with their illness, and manage their health more effectively. The scale captures the empowering effect of good clinical practice and is widely used in general practice research, quality improvement, and studies evaluating patient-centered and collaborative consultation styles. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|