Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| P-PROMETHEE plitogeenne laiendus× | Kriteeriumide tähtsus interkriteeriumite korrelatsiooni kaudu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Otsustamine | Otsustamine |
| Perekond | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 2019 | 1995 |
| Looja≠ | Smarandache, F. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tüüp≠ | Plithogenic outranking/ranking — Plithogenic Set (PltS: attribute values with contradiction degrees) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Algallikas≠ | Smarandache, F. (2019). Plithogenic MCDM methods. Infinite Study link ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Rööpnimetused | — | — |
| Seotud | 8 | 8 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | P-PROMETHEE (Plithogenic extension of P-PROMETHEE) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Smarandache, F. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|