Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| Uue objektiivsete kriteeriumide kaalude määramise meetod× | Aditiivse Suhte Hindamine× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Otsustamine | Otsustamine |
| Perekond | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 2017 | 2010 |
| Looja≠ | Bulut, E. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tüüp≠ | Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based) | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Algallikas≠ | Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Rööpnimetused | — | — |
| Seotud | 8 | 8 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|