ScholarGate
Assistent

Võrdle meetodeid

Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.

TOPSIS-e m-polaarne kõhklev-hägune laiendus×Kriteeriumide tähtsus interkriteeriumite korrelatsiooni kaudu×
ValdkondOtsustamineOtsustamine
PerekondMCDMMCDM
Tekkeaasta20191995
LoojaAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
Tüüpm-Polar Hesitant outranking/ranking — m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy Element (mHFE: m-tuple of HFEs, ℏ_m: Z → P([0,1]^m))Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
AlgallikasAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R. (2019). Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using an m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Symmetry DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Rööpnimetused
Seotud88
KokkuvõteMHF-TOPSIS (m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAndmestik
  1. v1
  2. 1 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED

Mine otsingusse Laadi slaidid alla

ScholarGateVõrdle meetodeid: MHF-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Loetud 2026-06-18 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/compare