Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| e-Index (Excess Citations)× | g-Index (Egghe)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Bibliomeetria | Bibliomeetria |
| Perekond | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 2009 | 2006 |
| Looja≠ | Chun-Ting Zhang | Leo Egghe |
| Tüüp≠ | Author-level excess-citation impact index | Author-level cumulative-citation impact index |
| Algallikas≠ | Zhang, C.-T. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5429. DOI ↗ | Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. DOI ↗ |
| Rööpnimetused | Zhang e-index, excess citation index, e index | Egghe g-index, Egghe index, g index |
| Seotud | 3 | 3 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | The e-index, proposed by Chun-Ting Zhang in 2009, isolates the citations that the h-index throws away. Inside the h-core of an author's h most-cited papers, the h-index implicitly credits each paper with only h citations and discards everything above that, even though top papers may have far more. The e-index recovers exactly this surplus: it is the square root of the difference between the total citations of the h-core and the h-squared citations that the h-index already accounts for. Zhang designed it as a complement rather than a replacement for the h-index, so that the pair (h, e) together describe both the size of an author's productive core and the concentration of excess impact within it. | The g-index, introduced by Leo Egghe in 2006, is an author-level bibliometric indicator designed to repair a structural weakness of Hirsch's h-index: its insensitivity to the size of the most-cited papers. Where the h-index caps the credit any single paper can earn at h, the g-index lets exceptionally cited articles raise an author's score. It is defined as the largest number g such that the g most-cited papers together accumulate at least g-squared citations. Because it rests on cumulative rather than per-paper citation counts, the g-index always equals or exceeds the h-index and rewards researchers whose impact is concentrated in a few landmark works as well as those with broad, steady output. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|