Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| Diferentsiaalse eseme funktsioneerimise (DIF) analüüs× | Mõõtmise invariaansuse testimine× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Psühhomeetria | Psühhomeetria |
| Perekond | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 1988 | 2000 |
| Looja≠ | Paul W. Holland & Dorothy T. Thayer (Mantel-Haenszel approach, 1988) | Vandenberg & Lance |
| Tüüp≠ | Item-level fairness / measurement equivalence analysis | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis procedure |
| Algallikas≠ | Holland, P. W. & Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. ETS Research Report Series. link ↗ | Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| Rööpnimetused≠ | Madde Yanlılık Analizi (DIF — Differential Item Functioning), item bias analysis, Mantel-Haenszel DIF, Lord chi-square DIF | Factorial Invariance, Measurement Equivalence, Configural-Metric-Scalar Testing, Ölçüm Değişmezliği |
| Seotud≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | Differential Item Functioning analysis examines whether examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — who have the same underlying ability respond differently to a test item. First formalised by Holland and Thayer in 1988 via the Mantel-Haenszel procedure, it is the principal tool in modern test development for detecting and removing item bias. | Measurement invariance testing is a sequence of nested confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that examines whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across distinct groups or time points. Systematized and popularized by Vandenberg and Lance (2000), the procedure tests a hierarchy of constraints — from identical factor patterns to identical item intercepts — so that researchers can justify meaningful group comparisons on latent means. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|