Võrdle meetodeid

	Kriitiline hermeneutiline analüüs	Narratiivianalüüs
Valdkond	Välimeetodid	Kvalitatiivne
Perekond	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Tekkeaasta	1970s (Habermas); extended through 1980s–1990s	1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook)
Looja	Jürgen Habermas (critical hermeneutics); Paul Ricoeur (hermeneutics of suspicion)	Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967)
Tüüp	Qualitative interpretive research approach	Qualitative interpretive method
Algallikas	Habermas, J. (1970). On Systematically Distorted Communication. Inquiry, 13(1–4), 205–218.	Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage.
Rööpnimetused	critical hermeneutics, critical-interpretive analysis, emancipatory hermeneutics, CHA	narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis)
Seotud	5	6
Kokkuvõte	Critical hermeneutic analysis combines interpretive hermeneutics with critical social theory to read texts and discourse not only for meaning but for embedded power relations, ideological distortions, and structures of domination. Originating in Habermas's critique of Gadamer and developed further by Ricoeur's hermeneutics of suspicion, the method asks both 'what does this text mean?' and 'whose interests does this meaning serve?'. It is widely used in education, social work, policy research, and health humanities.	Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced.