ScholarGate
Assistent

Võrdle meetodeid

Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.

Keeruline proportsionaalne hindamine×Kriteeriumide tähtsus interkriteeriumite korrelatsiooni kaudu×
ValdkondOtsustamineOtsustamine
PerekondMCDMMCDM
Tekkeaasta19961995
LoojaZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TüüpProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
AlgallikasZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Rööpnimetused
Seotud88
KokkuvõteCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAndmestik
  1. v1
  2. 1 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED

Mine otsingusse Laadi slaidid alla

ScholarGateVõrdle meetodeid: COPRAS · CRITIC. Loetud 2026-06-17 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/compare