ScholarGate
Assistent

Võrdle meetodeid

Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.

Conover-Imani post-hoc test×Friedmani test×
ValdkondStatistikaStatistika
PerekondRegression modelHypothesis test
Tekkeaasta19791937
LoojaConover & ImanMilton Friedman
TüüpNonparametric post-hoc multiple comparisonNonparametric repeated-measures comparison (by ranks)
AlgallikasConover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675–701. DOI ↗
RööpnimetusedConover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc TestiFriedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks, Friedman rank test, Friedman Testi
Seotud32
KokkuvõteThe Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test.The Friedman test is a nonparametric hypothesis test that compares three or more related conditions measured on the same blocks or subjects, serving as the rank-based alternative to repeated-measures ANOVA. It was introduced by Milton Friedman in 1937 and works on ordinal or continuous data without assuming normality.
ScholarGateAndmestik
  1. v1
  2. 2 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED

Mine otsingusse Laadi slaidid alla

ScholarGateVõrdle meetodeid: Conover-Iman Test · Friedman test. Loetud 2026-06-18 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/compare