Võrdle meetodeid

	Konstrukti valiidsus arvutilise adaptiivse testimise (CAT) puhul	Konvergendi kehtivus arvutipõhiste kohanduvate testide puhul
Valdkond	Psühhomeetria	Psühhomeetria
Perekond	Latent structure	Latent structure
Tekkeaasta	1989–2000s	1989–2000
Looja	Samuel Messick (unified validity framework); CAT application formalized by Wainer, van der Linden, and colleagues	Samuel Messick (validity framework); Wainer and colleagues (CAT context)
Tüüp	Validity evaluation / psychometric evidence gathering	Validity evidence / construct validation
Algallikas	Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education / Macmillan.	Wainer, H. (Ed.). (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805835113
Rööpnimetused	CAT construct validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, construct validity evidence in CAT	CAT convergent validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, convergent validity in CAT
Seotud	6	5
Kokkuvõte	Construct validity in computerized adaptive testing evaluates whether the latent trait estimates produced by a CAT instrument genuinely measure the intended psychological or educational construct. Because adaptive algorithms select items individually for each examinee, the validity evidence gathered must account for the variable item exposure and the IRT-based scoring that are unique to CAT administrations.	Convergent validity assessment for computerized adaptive tests (CATs) examines whether the ability or trait estimates produced by an adaptive algorithm correlate substantially with scores from other measures of the same construct. Because each examinee receives a different subset of items in a CAT, demonstrating that the resulting scores still converge with theoretically related external measures is a critical step in establishing construct validity evidence.