Võrdle meetodeid

	Võrdlev meetod	Dialektomeetria	Sisekonstruktsioon
Valdkond	Keeleteadus	Keeleteadus	Keeleteadus
Perekond	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Tekkeaasta	1786	1973	1891
Looja	Sir William Jones	Jean Seguy	Henry Heffner Hock
Tüüp	Empirical process pipeline	Empirical process pipeline	Empirical process pipeline
Algallikas	Hock, H. H. (1991). Principles of Historical Linguistics (2nd ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.	Seguy, J. (1973). La dialectométrie dans l'étude de l'espace linguistique. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 37, 1-24.	Hock, H. H. (1991). Principles of Historical Linguistics (2nd ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rööpnimetused	Historical Comparative Linguistics, Genetic Linguistics	Linguistic Distance Measurement, Quantitative Dialect Analysis	Interlingual Reconstruction, Diachronic Morphology
Seotud	4	1	3
Kokkuvõte	The Comparative Method is a foundational technique in historical linguistics for reconstructing ancestral languages and establishing genetic relationships between related languages. Pioneered by Sir William Jones in 1786, it systematically compares phonological, morphological, and lexical features across languages to identify regular sound correspondences and trace their shared origins. This method underpins modern historical linguistics and has been essential for understanding language families worldwide.	Dialectometry is a quantitative method for measuring linguistic distances between dialects or languages using objective metrics applied to phonological, lexical, or phonetic data. Pioneered by Jean Seguy in 1973, dialectometry compares word lists, pronunciations, or phonetic transcriptions across speech varieties to calculate similarity scores. The resulting distance matrices and dendrograms reveal patterns of dialect relatedness and geographic or social clustering. This method complements traditional dialectology and contributes to historical linguistics and sociolinguistics.	Internal Reconstruction is a historical linguistic method that reconstructs earlier stages of a single language by identifying internal inconsistencies, morphological irregularities, and distributional patterns within the language itself. Unlike the Comparative Method, which relies on comparing related languages, Internal Reconstruction uses evidence from within one language—such as suppletive forms, analogy-induced irregularities, and phonological asymmetries—to infer its historical structure and sound changes. This method is particularly valuable when only one written form of a language survives or when related languages are unavailable.