Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| Võrdlev klassikaline maa-teoreetilise uurimuse meetod× | Võrdlev ankurdatud teooria× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Kvalitatiivne | Kvalitatiivne |
| Perekond | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward |
| Looja≠ | Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars |
| Tüüp≠ | Qualitative theory-building design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Algallikas | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 |
| Rööpnimetused | Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis |
| Seotud | 6 | 6 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions. | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|