ScholarGate
Assistent

Võrdle meetodeid

Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.

Citizens' Jury Method×Participatory Evaluation×
ValdkondPublic PolicyPublic Policy
PerekondProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tekkeaasta19861998
LoojaNed Crosby (Jefferson Center); Peter Dienel developed the parallel PlanungszelleJ. Bradley Cousins & Elizabeth Whitmore
TüüpDeliberative mini-public methodCollaborative, stakeholder-engaged evaluation approach
AlgallikasCrosby, N., Kelly, J. M., & Schaefer, P. (1986). Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 46(2), 170–178. DOI ↗Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1998(80), 5–23. DOI ↗
RööpnimetusedCitizens Jury, Citizen Panel, Citizens' PanelCollaborative Evaluation, Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, Practical Participatory Evaluation
Seotud44
KokkuvõteA citizens' jury is a deliberative method that convenes a small, demographically representative panel of randomly selected citizens to consider a policy question in depth and produce reasoned recommendations. Modelled loosely on the trial jury, it gives ordinary people time, balanced information, expert witnesses and skilled facilitation so they can deliberate and reach a considered judgement on behalf of the wider public. Developed in the United States by Ned Crosby and his Jefferson Center, with a parallel German tradition (the Planungszelle) created by Peter Dienel, it is a leading form of deliberative 'mini-public'.Participatory evaluation is a family of approaches in which stakeholders — program staff, beneficiaries, community members — are engaged as active partners in conducting the evaluation rather than as passive subjects of it. In their influential 1998 framing, J. Bradley Cousins and Elizabeth Whitmore distinguished two streams: practical participatory evaluation, oriented to improving program decisions and use, and transformative participatory evaluation, oriented to empowerment and social justice. What unites them is shared control of the inquiry, but they vary along dimensions of who participates, how much control they hold, and how deeply they are involved.
ScholarGateAndmestik
  1. v1
  2. 1 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED

Mine otsingusse Laadi slaidid alla

ScholarGateVõrdle meetodeid: Citizens' Jury Method · Participatory Evaluation. Loetud 2026-06-25 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/compare