ScholarGate
Assistent

Võrdle meetodeid

Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.

Alternatiivse järjestusmeetodi kaheetapilise normaliseerimise arvestus×Kriteeriumide tähtsus interkriteeriumite korrelatsiooni kaudu×
ValdkondOtsustamineOtsustamine
PerekondMCDMMCDM
Tekkeaasta20221995
LoojaZdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TüüpTwo-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregationStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
AlgallikasZdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Rööpnimetused
Seotud88
KokkuvõteAROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAndmestik
  1. v1
  2. 1 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED

Mine otsingusse Download slides

ScholarGateVõrdle meetodeid: AROMAN · CRITIC. Loetud 2026-06-15 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/compare